🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a clear response from the Kremlin against proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in Russian state media, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide in the coming days on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the fact that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key position in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

In comments seen as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in European nations are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be required to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful message that if you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."